Do Cellulose Binding Domains Increase Substrate Accessibility?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article provides an overview of various theories proposed during the past five decades to describe the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose highlighting the major shifts that these theories have undergone. It also describes the effect of the cellulose-binding domain (CBD) of an exoglucanase/xylanase from bacterium Cellulomonas fimi on the enzymatic hydrolysis of Avicel. Pretreatment of Avicel with CBDCex at 4 and 37 degrees C as well as simultaneous addition of CBDCex to the hydrolytic enzyme (Celluclast, Novo, Nordisk) reduced the initial rate of hydrolysis owing to irreversible binding of CBD proteins to the substrate's binding sites. Nonetheless, near complete hydrolysis was achieved even in the presence of CBDCex. Protease treatment of both pure and CBDCex-treated Avicel reduced the substrates' hydrolyzability, perhaps owing to proteolysis of the hydrolyzing enzyme (Celluclast) by the residual Proteinase K remaining in the substrate. Better protocols for complete removal of CBD proteins from the substrate need to be developed to investigate the effect of CBD adsorption on cellulose digestibility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".