Comparative Analysis of Polymer and Linker Chemistries on the Efficacy of Immunocamouflage of Murine Leukocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Membrane grafting of methoxypoly(ethylene glycol) [mPEG] to allogeneic leukocytes attenuates allorecognition and significantly reduces the risk of graft-versus-host disease in mice. To optimize the immunological efficacy of polymer grafting, murine splenocytes were modified using three differing linker chemistries: CmPEG (5 kDa), BTCmPEG (5 and 20 kDa) and TmPEG (5 kDa). In vitro immunocamouflage efficacy was examined by flow cytometic analysis of leukocyte markers and mixed lymphocyte reactions (MLR). In contrast to CmPEG and BTCmPEG, TmPEG exerted significant cellular toxicity. Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated that both CmPEG and BTCmPEG were highly effective at camouflaging cell surface markers while TmPEG was ineffective. Furthermore, CmPEG and BTCmPEG dramatically blocked MLR allorecognition and cellular proliferation. Polymer length was the most critical factor in the immunocamouflage of cells with the BTCmPEG 20 kDa being the most effective. In contrast to other immunomodulatory approaches, immunocamouflage of leukocytes yields a multivalent effect globally interfering with attachment, allorecognition, presentation and costimulation pathways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".