MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993925509 · doi:10.1121/1.3588253

The under-ice soundscape in Great Slave Lake near the City of Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada.

2011· article· en· W1993925509 on OpenAlexaffabout
Bruce Martin, Pete A. Cott

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsImpactGovernment of Northwest TerritoriesFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSound (geography)Ambient noise levelSubarctic climateBiotaGeologyOceanographySoundscapeBaseline (sea)Environmental sciencePhysical geographyEcologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Department of Fisheries and Oceans and JASCO deployed an AMARs sound data recorder in Great Slave Lake near Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, between December 2009 and March 2010. One of the objectives of these recordings was to provide long-term ambient noise measurements in a large frozen lake near a major urban center. A recent study reported spot-measurements of under-ice noise in a subarctic lake from anthropogenic activity raising the sound levels up to 46 dB above ambient, and 10-h average ambient levels that were very low (spectral density levels of ∼45 dB re 1 μPa). The current Great Slave Lake data provide the opportunity to determine the long-term baseline of under-ice sound levels and how anthropogenic activity, such as air and ice-road traffic, adjacent to the study site affects the ambient levels and how these sounds may impact aquatic biota. Regressions of the ambient levels against wind speed and temperature are also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207