MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993944644 · doi:10.1086/301206

Near-Infrared Adaptive Optics Imaging of the Central Regions of Nearby S[CLC]c[/CLC] Galaxies. I. M33

2000· article· en· W1993944644 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStarsGalaxyLuminositySpiral galaxyLuminosity functionAdaptive opticsTelescopeStar formation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Near-infrared images obtained with the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope (CFHT) Adaptive Optics Bonnette (AOB) are used to investigate the stellar content within 18'' of the center of the Local Group spiral galaxy M33. Asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars with near-infrared spectral energy distributions similar to those of giants in the solar neighborhood and Baade's window are detected over most of the field. Neither the peak brightness nor the color of the AGB sequence on the ( K , J - K ) color-magnitude diagram changes with distance from the galaxy center. The bolometric luminosity function (LF) of these stars has a discontinuity near M bol = -5.25, and comparisons with evolutionary tracks suggest that most of the AGB stars formed in a burst of star formation 1–3 Gyr in the past, indicating that the star formation rate near the center of M33 has varied significantly during the past few Gyr. The images are also used to investigate the integrated near-infrared photometric properties of the nucleus and the surrounding central light concentration. The nucleus is bluer than the central light concentration, in agreement with previous studies at visible wavelengths. The near-infrared photometric properties of the nucleus are reminiscent of relatively young clusters in the Magellanic Clouds, while the photometric properties of the central light concentration are similar to those of globular clusters. The CO index of the central light concentration 0 5 from the galaxy center is 0.05, which corresponds to [Fe/H] ∼ -1.2 for simple stellar systems. Hence, the central light concentration could not have formed from the chemically enriched material that dominates the present-day inner disk of M33.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207