MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993975357 · doi:10.1029/2005ja011049

Energetic particle observations from the Ulysses COSPIN instruments obtained during the October–November 2003 events

2005· article· en· W1993975357 on OpenAlexaff
R. B. McKibben, J. D. Anglin, J. J. Connell, S. Dalla, B. Heber, H. Kunow, C. Lopate, R. G. Marsden, T. R. Sanderson, Ming Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
FundersNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsHeliospherePhysicsSolar energetic particlesCoronal mass ejectionSolar windJupiter (rocket family)ElectronParticle (ecology)Solar flareCharged particleSolar cycle 22AstrophysicsSolar cycleAstronomyPlasmaSpacecraftIonNuclear physicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report comprehensive observations of solar energetic particle intensities at energies from 0.3 to >100 MeV made by the suite of six Ulysses COSPIN energetic charged particle instruments on the Ulysses spacecraft during the period of intense solar activity in October/November 2003. We also discuss observations of particle anisotropies in selected energy ranges made by these instruments. Located near the orbit of Jupiter and only about 6° north of the heliographic equatorial plane, Ulysses provided important measurements for comparison with 1 AU observations and for assessing the nature of particle propagation in this period of isolated but intense solar activity in the declining phase of the solar activity cycle. The most significant conclusion is that the particle populations in the inner heliosphere were highly nonuniform throughout the events, strongly guided and confined by magnetic structures such as stream interfaces in the solar wind. This provides strong contrast to the nearly uniform intensities that were quickly established after large events near the peak of the solar cycle. Points of particular interest are (1) possible observation at 5.2 AU during onset of differential filling of flux tubes and confinement of high‐energy (>∼20 MeV) particles to flux tubes in the course of propagation from the source; (2) apparent exclusion of energetic particles from the interior of a large coronal mass ejection (CME); (3) possible triggered release of electrons from Jupiter by interaction with the same CME, and propagation of the electrons within the closed fields of the CME.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.459

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsFrench-language works237,207