MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994000014 · doi:10.1080/01658100701647712

Early Versus Delayed Correction of Infantile Strabismus in Macaque Monkeys: Effects on Long-Term Eye Alignment

2007· article· en· W1994000014 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Ophthalmology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicVisual perception and processing mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStrabismusEsotropiaMedicineMacaqueOphthalmologyOptometryPsychologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To determine how the duration of infantile strabismus influences the eventual eye alignment. Methods: Six infant macaques were fitted with prisms, which were removed after 3 weeks (wks.), 3 months (mos.), or 6 mos. Two control monkeys wore plano lenses. Eye alignment was measured using search coils. Results: Longer duration of infantile strabismus is correlated with a more severe misalignment. The strabismus in the 6-mos. group was 96% greater than that in the 3-mos. group, which, in turn, was 25 times greater than that in the 3-wks group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Longer duration of infantile strabismus causes larger-angle esotropia. Early correction of infantile strabismus is supported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it