MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994024136 · doi:10.1155/s0161171204406516

Precise lim sup behavior of probabilities of large deviations forsums of i.i.d. random variables

2004· article· en· W1994024136 on OpenAlexafffund
Deli Li, Andrew Rosalsky

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbability and Risk Models
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAlgorithmComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let { X , X n ; n ≥ 1} be a sequence of real‐valued i.i.d. random variables and let , n ≥ 1. In this paper, we study the probabilities of large deviations of the form P ( S n > t n 1/ p ), P ( S n < − t n 1/ p ), and P (| S n | > t n 1/ p ), where t > 0 and 0 < p < 2. We obtain precise asymptotic estimates for these probabilities under mild and easily verifiable conditions. For example, we show that if and if there exists a nonincreasing positive function ϕ ( x ) on [0, ∞ ) which is regularly varying with index α ≤ −1 such that limsup x → ∞ P (| X | > x 1/ p )/ ϕ ( x ) = 1, then for every t > 0, limsup n → ∞ P (| S n | > t n 1/ p )/( n ϕ ( n )) = t p α .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.775

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical SciencesSame topicProbability and Risk ModelsFrench-language works237,207