Rethinking the role of tumour necrosis factor-alpha in ultraviolet (UV) B-induced immunosuppression: altered immune response in UV-irradiated TNFR1R2 gene-targeted mutant mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ultraviolet (UV) B-induced immunosuppression, implicated in the pathogenesis of skin cancers, is postulated to be mediated in part by cis-urocanic acid (cis-UCA) via tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha. TNF-alpha produces morphological changes in Langerhans cells indistinguishable from those induced by UVB exposure and antibodies against TNF-alpha have been demonstrated to inhibit UVB-induced immunosuppression in vivo. OBJECTIVES: To clarify further the role of TNF-alpha in UVB-induced immunosuppression and in cis-UCA immunosuppression. METHODS: We performed a contact hypersensitivity (CHS) assay on gene-targeted mutant mice (TNFR1R2-/-) lacking genes for both receptors (p55 and p75) for TNF-alpha. Mice were either irradiated with UVB or injected intradermally with cis-UCA, sensitized with 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene, challenged on the ears and the response was measured. RESULTS: The TNFR1R2-/- mice showed hyporesponsiveness in the CHS response compared with wild-type (P < 0.001), confirming the proinflammatory role of TNF-alpha. However, significant suppression of CHS was seen after irradiation and after cis-UCA injection in both locally (sensitization on irradiated site; P < 0.05) and systemically (sensitization on non-irradiated site; P < 0.05) sensitized wild-type and gene-targeted mice. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that TNF-alpha signalling is only partially involved in UVB-induced immunosuppression and does not play a major part in the cis-UCA immunosuppression mechanism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".