Distribution of Basal/Myoepithelial Markers in Benign and Malignant Bronchioloalveolar Proliferations of the Lung
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigated the staining pattern of commonly used basal cell/myoepithelial markers, such as p63 (a p53-homologous nuclear protein), basal cell-specific cytokeratin antibody (34betaE12, K903), and smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SMMHC) in benign and malignant bronchioloalveolar proliferations of the lung. We studied 85 lung lesions consisting of 35 bronchioloalveolar carcinoma, 30 well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, and 20 cases of benign lung lesions. In normal lung, p63, K903, and SMMHC decorated the basal cells of large and small airways and occasional cells of terminal bronchioles. In reactive processes, a distinctive staining pattern was present in 19/20 (95%) of the cases characterized by staining of basal cells of the airways and bronchiolar epithelium and squamous metaplastic epithelium for p63 and K903, whereas 12/20 (60%) stained with SMMHC. Respiratory ciliated cells, alveolar epithelial cells, and nonepithelial cells were negative. In bronchioloalveolar carcinoma, a discontinuous peripheral rim of p63-immunoreactive cells was retained surrounding and intermingled with the malignant bronchioloalveolar proliferation in 31/35 (88.5%) cases, SMMHC in 28/35 (80%) cases, and K903 in 20/35 (57%) cases. For adenocarcinoma, a majority of the cases (28/30, 93%) were negative for p63 and K903; however, SMMHC showed artifactual staining in the desmoplastic stroma in 6/30 (20%) cases. Our results highlighted the differential expression of basal cell markers across various bronchioloalveolar lesions. The staining pattern of basal cells in bronchioloalveolar carcinoma supports that these neoplasms may actually be carcinoma in-situ.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".