MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994107505 · doi:10.12789/geocanj.2014.41.053

Lawrence Head Volcanics and Dunnage Mélange, Newfoundland Appalachians: Origin by Ordovician Ridge Subduction or in Back-Arc Rift?

2014· article· en· W1994107505 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Adam Schoonmaker, W. S. F. Kidd, Stephen E. DeLong, John F. Bender

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoscience Canada · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity at AlbanyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGeologyGabbroSubductionSillRiftOrdovicianVolcanic rockGeochemistryVolcanic arcAccretionary wedgeBack-arc basinZirconIgneous rockPetrologyPaleontologyVolcanoStructural basinTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reviews the geological setting and reports new geochemical trace element data from the Ordovician Lawrence Head Volcanics (LHV) and the underlying gabbro sills in the Exploits Group. In combination with existing published analyses and ages of these rocks, the volcanic rocks and sills are indistinguishable in composition and age, and the data are consistent with the hypothesis that they represent the same (mostly E-MORB composition) magmatic event in the early–mid Darriwilian (~465 ± 2 Ma). The LHV and their enclosing strata show regional evidence for: 1) upward decline of volume and grain size of arc-derived volcaniclastic materials over the uppermost interval of turbidite sedimentary strata below the LHV; 2) change to shallow marine conditions locally by the end of the LHV event, followed immediately by significant subsidence, and 3) no evidence of coarse-grained clastic input, nor of normal faulting, during or immediately after LHV magmatism. Ridge–trench interaction (ridge subduction) at a subduction system is consistent with all of these features and spatial distribution of related elements, but a rift (back-arc) origin over a subduction zone can only accommodate the compositions, and is inconsistent with the geological evidence. The Dunnage Mélange (DM) has been interpreted either as olistostromal in a developing back-arc rift basin, or as a subduction accretionary prism. Peraluminous intrusions in the mélange (Coaker Porphyry ― CP) are more readily explained by ridge subduction, and a previously reported zircon age (469 ± 4 Ma) is consistent with the age of the LHV and gabbro sills, also interpreted as products of ridge subduction. Localization of the CP in the eastern area of DM, and of most of the large LHV-derived volcanic blocks in the western DM, suggests a slightly younger age, and perhaps a different mechanism, for the origin of the western DM.SOMMAIRECet article passe en revue le contexte géologique et présente de nouvelles données géochimiques d’éléments traces des roches volcaniques ordoviciennes de Lawrence Head (LHV) et des filons-couches de gabbro sous-jacents du Groupe Exploits. Considérant la combinaison des données d’analyse publiées et des datations de ces roches, les roches volcaniques et les filons-couches sont indiscernables tant en composition qu’en âge, et les données sont compatibles avec l’hypothèse selon laquelle ils représentent le même événement magmatique (principalement E-MORB) du Darriwilien précoce à moyen (~465 ± 2 Ma). Les LHV ainsi que les strates de l’encaissant renferment des indices régionaux qui montrent : 1) que le volume et la granulométrie des matériaux volcanoclastiques d’arc diminuent vers le haut dans l’intervalle supérieur des strates de turbidites sédimentaires sous les LHV; 2) que le changement vers des milieux marins peu profonds localement vers la fin de l’événement des LHV a été suivi immédiatement par une subsidence importante, et 3) qu’il n’existe pas d’indices d’apports clastiques à gros grains, non plus que de formation de failles normales, durant ou immédiatement après le magmatisme des LHV. L’interaction crête-fosse (subduction de la crête) au lieu d’un système de subduction concorde avec toutes ces caractéristiques et la répartition spatiale des éléments reliés, alors qu’une origine de crête (arrière-arc) au-dessus d’une zone de subduction ne peut expliquer que les compositions et qu’elle est incompatible avec l’évidence géologique. Le Dunnage Mélange (DM) a été interprété soit comme un olistostome dans un bassin d’arrière-arc en développement, ou comme un prisme d’accrétion de subduction. Les intrusions hyperalumineuses dans le mélange (Porphyre Coaker — CP), s’explique plus facilement par une subduction de crête, et un âge de datation sur zircon de (469 ± 4 Ma) correspond à l’âge des LHV et des filons-couche de gabbro, aussi interprétés comme produits d’une subduction de crête. La localisation du CP dans la portion orientale du DM, et de la majeure partie des grands blocs volcaniques dérivés des LHV de la portion ouest du DM, suggère un âge légèrement plus jeune, et peut-être un mécanisme différent, pour l’origine de la portion ouest du DM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeoscience CanadaSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207