MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994125719 · doi:10.3130/aijt.14.525

MANAGEMENT OF LIVING ENVIRONMENT IN HABITAT '67 AFTER HOUSING PRIVATIZATION

2008· article· en· W1994125719 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yoshiro Morita, Asako Yamauchi, Shigetomo KIKUCHI, Shuichi Matsumura

Bibliographic record

VenueAIJ Journal of Technology and Design · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicArchitecture, Modernity, and Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPavilionHabitatStyle (visual arts)Architectural engineeringThematic mapEnvironmental resource managementBusinessGeographyEnvironmental planningCivil engineeringEngineeringEcologyCartographyEnvironmental scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Habitat '67 is an experimental housing complex built as a thematic pavilion of Montreal Expo in 1967. This case study, based on the on-site survey, traced the transition of the management style of its living environment after the housing privatization in 1986, and pointed out that the original architects and the general manager have played substantial roles in coordinating spatial modifications by each residents with keeping its architectural features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.460
Threshold uncertainty score0.914

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIJ Journal of Technology and DesignSame topicArchitecture, Modernity, and DesignFrench-language works237,207