Spectroscopic study of the short-period WN5o + O8.5V binary system WR127 (HD 186943)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Combined with previous information (orbital period P= 9.5550 d and inclination ), new optical spectroscopic data lead to improved circular orbits for this WR + O system, with mass 13.4 M⊙ of the WN5o star and 23.9 M⊙ of its O8.5V companion. These are normal for their spectral types. The WR/O mass ratio, q≃ 0.56, is reasonable for such a binary. The relatively large orbital separation between the two components (∼63 R⊙) implies that there is currently no interaction between the two stars beyond their colliding winds. Analysis of the excess line emission and absorption arising in the wind–wind collision zone yields the following parameters: streaming velocity vstrm= 1104 km s−1, cone opening half-angle θ≃ 59° and Coriolis angle shift . Using probable values of mass-loss rate and terminal wind velocity for each star, a value of θ≃ 37° is obtained. The difference in θ is likely due to a combination of uncertainty in these parameters and radiative braking. Altogether, WR127 is a normal, detached and non-photospherically eclipsing binary system, although it does show atmospheric ‘eclipses’.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".