MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994150421 · doi:10.1021/bc100160k

Stable Gold Nanoparticle Conjugation to Internal DNA Positions: Facile Generation of Discrete Gold Nanoparticle−DNA Assemblies

2010· article· en· W1994150421 on OpenAlexafffund
Yongqiang Wen, Christopher K. McLaughlin, Pik Kwan Lo, Hua Yang, Hanadi F. Sleiman

Bibliographic record

VenueBioconjugate Chemistry · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsColloidal goldChemistryConjugateNanoparticleDNAAgarose gel electrophoresisCombinatorial chemistryAgaroseNanotechnologyChromatographyBiochemistryMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A straightforward strategy to stably anchor one or more gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) at both the internal and terminal positions of single-stranded DNA is presented. Discrete DNA-AuNP conjugates are isolated using a noncovalent extension strand strategy, that helps to resolve prepared species by agarose gel electrophoresis (AGE). These are used to assemble well-defined AuNP squares and rectangles. Two complementary bis-AuNP-labeled DNA conjugates are then prepared. One of these places two smaller (5 nm) AuNPs at defined internal positions within a DNA strand, and the other places two larger (13 nm) AuNPs at each of its terminal positions. We show the self-assembly of these bis-AuNP conjugates into a tapered tetrameric gold nanoparticle "antenna" structures of direct relevance to engineered "hot spots" and surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) substrates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioconjugate ChemistrySame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207