MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994178435 · doi:10.1097/wno.0000000000000122

Do the Clinical Features in Infantile-Onset Saccade Initiation Delay (Congenital Ocular Motor Apraxia) Correlate With Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings?

2014· article· en· W1994178435 on OpenAlex
Michael S. Salman, Kristin M. Ikeda

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuro-Ophthalmology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of WinnipegChildren's Hospital Research Institute of ManitobaWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetic resonance imagingSaccadeMedicineApraxiaFunctional magnetic resonance imagingAudiologyOphthalmologyNeurosciencePsychologyRadiologyEye movement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Infantile-onset saccade initiation delay (ISID) is a defect in saccade initiation. Other features may include impaired smooth ocular pursuit, developmental delay, hypotonia, and ataxia. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be normal or show supratentorial or infratentorial abnormalities. Our aim was to correlate the clinical features of ISID with brain MRI findings. METHODS: Detailed review of the English medical literature between 1952 and 2012 revealed 67 studies with possible ISID. Patients without a brain MRI or with inadequate information, Joubert syndrome, neurodegenerative disorders, and acquired saccade initiation delay were excluded. Ninety-one patients (age range, 3 months to 45 years) met the inclusion criteria and were divided into 3 groups based on their brain MRI findings: normal (n = 55), supratentorial abnormalities (n = 17), and infratentorial abnormalities (n = 19). The patients' clinical features including the direction of head thrusts, smooth pursuit, optokinetic response (OKR), tone, development, and coordination were compared and analyzed among the MRI groups using χ test. RESULTS: Horizontal head thrusts were significantly more common in patients with infratentorial abnormalities or normal brain MRI, whereas vertical head thrusts were more common among patients with supratentorial abnormalities (P < 0.0001). The slow phases of the OKR were significantly more likely to be impaired in patients with supratentorial or infratentorial abnormalities than in those with a normal MRI (P = 0.011). Other neuro-ophthalmological, neurological, and developmental features were similar among patients in the 3 neuroimaging groups. CONCLUSION: The direction of head thrust and the integrity of the slow phases of the OKR are useful clinical indicators of possible sites of abnormality on brain MRI in patients with ISID.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.608

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it