Stem Canker of Cabbage Seed Stalks Caused by <i>Botrytis cinerea</i> in Western Washington
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stem cankers were observed during 1998 on bolting stalks of cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.) in seed production fields in western Washington. In 1999, approximately 4 ha of cabbage hybrid 'Wk 121, was severely affected. Lesions occurred at the base of seed stalks after they emerged from heads of plants overwintered in the field, or on flower branches and seed-bearing stalks that developed during the growing season. Lesions girdled a branch or stalk, and killed or weakened it so that it broke during pod fill. Isolates of Botrytis cinerea Pers.:Fr. were obtained by plating spores from lesions onto potato dextrose agar. To confirm pathogenicity, stems of 12-day-old seedlings of ‘Wk 121’ were scraped with a razor blade or left intact, atomized with sterile 0.01 % Tween 80 or a suspension of Botrytis cinerea at 1.0 × 106 conidia/ml, and kept at 20°C in a dew chamber in plastic bags. The fungus was reisolated from small lesions on wounded stems inoculated with B. cinerea after 3 days. No lesions developed on non-wounded or wounded control plants. B. cinerea is reported to cause storage rot of cabbage (2) and gray mold on Brassica oleracea L. (cabbage, kale, kohlrabi, wild cabbage) in Washington (1) but not stem canker. This new seed crop disease may be the result of predisposition to infection by freezing injury or mechanical damage on a highly susceptible cultivar grown under cool, wet weather. References: (1) D. F. Farr et al. 1989. Fungi on Plants and Plant Products in the United States. American Phytopathological Society. St. Paul, MN. (2) O. C. Yoder and M. L. Whalen. Can. J. Bot. 53:691, 1975.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".