MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994201830 · doi:10.1002/cjce.21808

A novel modification of vapour‐lift liquid distributor

2013· article· en· W1994201830 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wei Du, Wenming Liu, Jian Xu, Weisheng Wei

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChina University of Petroleum, BeijingNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDistributorPressure dropLift (data mining)Materials scienceLiquid dropDrop (telecommunication)MechanicsTube (container)Liquid flowMechanical engineeringEngineeringComposite materialComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract For upgrading the liquid distribution in a trickle‐bed reactor, the distributor is always the primary consideration. The vapour‐lift tube device, most widely used in industry, still has disadvantages like mal‐distribution to overcome. Therefore in this paper, two major modifications, that is increasing of slot numbers and opening side pores, were proposed to improve its liquid distribution performance. Cold‐flow model tests were carried out with liquid distribution, and pressure drop was measured by liquid collectors and Omega pressure sensor, respectively. The results showed that as compared with proto type, the modified liquid distributor has a better liquid distribution performance and a lower pressure drop. Liquid distribution increases with the increasing of gas/liquid velocity ratio ϵ only when it is <200. The pressure drop of new distributor increases with increasing of inner tube gas velocity and ϵ . Finally, correlations for liquid distribution and pressure drop of a new distributor were derived, showing rather good agreements with experimental results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicHeat and Mass Transfer in Porous MediaFrench-language works237,207