MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994209116 · doi:10.1097/dad.0b013e3181cd3158

Complete Spontaneous Regression of Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

2010· article· en· W1994209116 on OpenAlex
Jill C. Wooff, J Trites, Noreen M. Walsh, Martin Bullock

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Dermatopathology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPolyomavirus and related diseases
Canadian institutionsCapital District Health Authority
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMerkel cell carcinomaMedicineNeck dissectionLymphPathologyCarcinomaLymph nodeMetastasisOncologyInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare aggressive primary cutaneous neuroendocrine neoplasm with a high rate of recurrence and metastasis. We report a case of a 94-year-old woman who experienced complete spontaneous regression of metastatic MCC. Nine months after complete excision of the primary MCC on her left eyebrow, metastatic MCC was confirmed with a fine-needle aspiration of a 4-cm mass on the left side of her neck. Three months later the mass had reduced in size to 2 cm and a neck dissection was performed. Her submandibular gland, thoracic duct and 25 lymph nodes were negative for MCC. Two of the lymph nodes, the larger measuring 1.3 cm, contained extensive amounts of fibrosis, with accumulation of macrophages and other chronic inflammatory cells. The literature documents 6 similar cases of complete spontaneous regression of metastatic MCC. The mechanism for regression is not well understood and is thought to involve T-cell-mediated immune response and apoptosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it