Electrochemical Activity and Catalyst Utilization of Low Pt and Thickness Controlled Membrane Electrode Assemblies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An improved catalyst deposition methodology based on a piezo-electric printing technique has been developed and used to fabricate catalyst coated membranes (CCM) with thin catalyst layers (1−5 μm) and ultra-low Pt loadings (0.02−0.12 mgPt/cm2). The performance of these CCMs was examined in proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). The catalyst utilization was observed to increase with decreasing catalyst layer thickness (decreasing Pt loading). The printed CCM with two layers containing an ultra-low Pt loading (0.02 mgPt/cm2) exhibited Pt utilizations of 100%. Neglecting the anode contributions, the mass activity at 850 mV for the printed CCM is nearly 76.5 mA/mgPt which is 3.5 times higher than that for the CCM fabricated by conventional spraying method (22.5 mA/mgPt).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".