MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994251149 · doi:10.4000/trans.829

Flamme d’amour

2013· article· fr· W1994251149 on OpenAlex
Marie-Ève Fleury

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTRANS- · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article porte sur l’amour absolu, entre deux êtres humains chez Bachmann ou entre une âme croyante et son Dieu chez saint Jean de la Croix, et sur les limites – imposées aux êtres humains par des autorités religieuses, juridiques ou sociales afin de les maintenir dans le calme sommeil de l’ignorance – qui le rendent impossible. Considéré comme un acte de révolte contre ces limites, cet amour est symbolisé par le feu et la nuit obscure, qui évoquent aussi la souffrance résultant de l’inassouvissement d’un désir impossible. Mise à part la mort, qui est le seul moyen radical par lequel nous pouvons, pour ainsi dire, échapper aux contraintes de ce monde, l’art permet de franchir certaines frontières, de toucher une grandeur proche de l’universalité et de l’éternité, comme en témoignent les images employées aussi bien par saint Jean de la Croix que par Bachmann pour parler de l’amour, de la souffrance et du miracle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it