MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994288316 · doi:10.1002/ajh.10366

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura associated with a prolactin‐producing pituitary adenoma

2003· article· en· W1994288316 on OpenAlexaff
Kálmán Kovács, Marie Garvey

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Hematology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThrombotic thrombocytopenic purpuraGalactorrheaPituitary adenomaAutopsyProlactinVon Willebrand factorSchistocyteInternal medicinePituitary glandPathologyAdenomaPituitary tumorsPlatelet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report here the case of a 44-year-old woman with thrombocytopenia, anemia, convulsions, hyperprolactinemia, and galactorrhea. The patient died of cardiac failure. Autopsy revealed PAS-positive and von Willebrand factor-positive microthrombi in the arterioles and capillaries of many organs, mainly in the heart and brain, confirming the clinical diagnosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. In the pituitary, a prolactin-producing adenoma was identified. To our knowledge, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura accompanied by a prolactin-secreting pituitary adenoma has not yet been described. The question of whether the association between the vascular changes and the pituitary adenoma is incidental or causal cannot be answered. Further studies are required to determine whether prolactin released from the pituitary tumor in excess played a role in the formation of microthrombi causing multiple organ failure and the demise of the patient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of HematologySame topicPituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207