MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994294550 · doi:10.1117/12.898179

MR-i: high-speed dual-cameras hyperspectral imaging FTS

2011· article· en· W1994294550 on OpenAlexaff
Florent Prel, Louis Moreau, Stéphane Lantagne, Claude Roy, Christian Vallières, Luc Lévesque

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Polarization and Ellipsometry
Canadian institutionsABB (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperspectral imagingDual (grammatical number)Optical imagingComputer scienceRemote sensingComputer visionArtificial intelligencePhysicsOpticsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From scientific research to deployable operational solutions, Fourier-Transform Infrared (FT-IR) spectroradiometry is widely used for the development and enhancement of military and research applications. These techniques include targets IR signature characterization, development of advanced camouflage techniques, aircraft engine's plumes monitoring, meteorological sounding and atmospheric composition analysis such as detection and identification of chemical threats. Imaging FT-IR spectrometers have the capability of generating 3D images composed of multiple spectra associated with every pixel of the mapped scene. That data allow for accurate spatial characterization of target's signature by resolving spatially the spectral characteristics of the observed scenes. MR-i is the most recent addition to the MR product line series and generates spectral data cubes in the MWIR and LWIR. The instrument is designed to acquire the spectral signature of various scenes with high temporal, spatial and spectral resolution. The four port architecture of the interferometer brings modularity and upgradeability since the two output ports of the instrument can be populated with different combinations of detectors (imaging or not). For instance to measure over a broad spectral range from 1.3 to 13 μm, one output port can be equipped with a LWIR camera while the other port is equipped with a MWIR camera. Both ports can be equipped with cameras serving the same spectral range but set at different sensitivity levels in order to increase the measurement dynamic range and avoid saturation of bright parts of the scene while simultaneously obtaining good measurement of the faintest parts of the scene. Various telescope options are available for the input port. Overview of the instrument capabilities will be presented as well as test results and results from field trials for a configuration with two MWIR cameras. That specific system is dedicated to the characterization of airborne targets. The expanded dynamic range allowed by the two MWIR cameras enables to simultaneously measure the spectral signature of the cold background and of the warmest elements of the scene (flares, jet engines exhausts, etc.).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicOptical Polarization and EllipsometryFrench-language works237,207