Nonlinear Optical Properties of Halogenated Aniline Oligomers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High values of the first (b) and second (g) hyperpolarizabilities were obtained for the halogenated oligomers of the three neutral forms of polyaniline (pernigraniline, emeraldine, and leucoemeraldine). For enhancement of the b and g magnitudes, the t-butyl, t-butoxy, and dimethylamine electron donor groups were introduced into various halogenated oligomers. The effect of the oligomer chain size on the b and g magnitude was also investigated by considering the aniline trimers and hexamers. The highest value of the dynamic b hyperpolarizability (1060 nm) for the second-order harmonic generation (SHG) was found for a pernigraniline hexamer containing fluorine and dimethylamine substituents. The highest g hyperpolarizability magnitudes for the third-order harmonic generation (THG) were observed for all halogenated pernigraniline hexamers containing dimethylamine as a substituent. The AM1/TDHF results show that the halogenated aniline-based molecules are promising candidates for applications in nonlinear optics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".