MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994379765 · doi:10.5539/apr.v7n3p10

Possible Forms of the Solution for Spherically Symmetric Static Problem in General Relativity

2015· article· en· W1994379765 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Valery V. Vasiliev, L. V. Fedorov

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral relativityTensor (intrinsic definition)Metric tensorExact solutions in general relativitySchwarzschild metricMathematics of general relativityTheory of relativityMetric (unit)EinsteinIntroduction to the mathematics of general relativityPhysicsTheoretical motivation for general relativityApplied mathematicsClassical mechanicsMathematicsMathematical analysisNumerical relativityGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper is concerned with analysis of various forms of solution for the spherically symmetric static problem of the General Theory of Relativity (GTR). The problem under consideration is reduced to three equations for the components of the Einstein tensor which include three components of the metric tensor. However, only two of these three equations are mutually independent which means that the solution is not unique. Three possible forms of the solution are derived and analyzed in paper. One of these solutions is the traditional singular Schwarzchild solution, whereas two other solutions are not singular.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics ResearchSame topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207