UCP3 and its putative function: consistencies and controversies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The physiological function of uncoupling protein 3 (UCP3) is as yet unknown. Based on its 57% homology to UCP1 whose physiologic function is uncoupling and thermogenesis, UCP3 was attributed with the function of mitochondrial uncoupling through proton-leak reactions. UCP3 is expressed selectively in muscle, a tissue in which it has been estimated that proton leak accounts for approx. 50% of resting energy metabolism. Genetic linkage, association and variant studies suggest a role for UCP3 in obesity and/or diabetes. Studies of the heterologous expression of UCP3 in yeast provide support for the idea that UCP3 can uncouple mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, but the physiological relevance of these results is questionable. In vitro studies of mitochondria from Ucp3(-/-) mice provide support, but there are no changes in resting metabolic rate (RMR) of mice. In vivo studies demonstrate increased ATP synthesis, but estimates of substrate oxidation rate indicate no change. Mice that greatly overexpress Ucp3 in muscle have increased RMR. Inconsistent with the function of uncoupling are the observations that fasting results in increased expression of UCP3, but no change in muscle proton leak. Moreover, fasting decreases energy expenditure in muscle. Expression patterns for Ucp3 and lipid-metabolism genes support a physiological role in fatty acid oxidation. Overall, findings support a role for Ucp3 in fatty acid metabolism that may have implications for obesity and/or Type II diabetes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".