MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994397855 · doi:10.1063/1.3230101

Strong double excitation and open-shell features in the near-edge x-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy of ferrocene and ferrocenium compounds

2009· article· en· W1994397855 on OpenAlexafffund
Edwige Otero, Nobuhiro Kosugi, Stephen G. Urquhart

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicFerrocene Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsXANESFerroceneOpen shellChemistryAbsorption spectroscopySpectral lineAb initioSpectroscopyCovalent bondAbsorption (acoustics)CrystallographyPhysical chemistryMaterials sciencePhysicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have recorded the iron 2p and carbon 1s near-edge x-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) spectra of decamethyl ferrocene (Fe 3d(6)) and ferrocenium hexafluorophosphate (Fe 3d(5)), two low spin compounds with closed- and open-shell electron configurations, respectively. These species have a similar covalent bonding environment but a different electron configuration, allowing us to examine the role of ligand-metal interactions and electron correlation responsible for their NEXAFS spectra. We have interpreted these spectra with the aid of ab initio configuration interaction (CI) calculations. The CI calculations indicate that double excitation is essential to interpret the Fe 2p NEXAFS spectra of not only the open-shell ferrocenium ion but also the closed-shell ferrocene species, even though the ground states of both species are well described within the Hartree-Fock single-configuration approximation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicFerrocene Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207