MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Occupational asthma due to liquorice roots

2002· article· en· W1994400327 on OpenAlexaff
André Cartier, Jean‐Luc Malo, Manon Labrecque

Bibliographic record

VenueAllergy · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOccupational exposure and asthma
Canadian institutionsHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsthmaMedicineDermatologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe the case of an herbalist who developed occupational asthma due to liquorice roots as confirmed by specific inhalation challenges. Many high-molecular-weight agents have been reported as causes of occupational asthma (OA) (1) (asthmanet.com, asthme.csst.qc.ca) A 33-year-old woman started to work as an herbalist 13 years ago. In her workplace, she was exposed to several natural products. She started suffering from asthma 8–9 years before being referred. She reported that her asthma symptoms were worse at work and improved on weekends and during a maternity leave. She also had rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms at work. She mentioned that several products brought on asthmatic symptoms when she handled them in powder form at work, including liquorice root. Her FEV1 varied from 1.5 to 2.2 L (pred = 3.2 l) and the concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20 values), from 0.5 to 2.0 mg/ml (slight to moderate airway hyperresponsiveness (2) when she was assessed while at work. Peak expiratory flows showed greater fluctuations in some instances during periods at work. Skin-prick tests with a liquorice extract showed an 8 mm immediate weal. Skin-prick tests were also positive (= 3 mm weal) to common inhalants (pollens, mites) and to other products handled at her workplace, including echinacea, nettle, hop and thistle. Specific inhalation challenges carried out by exposing the subject with a dry aerosol generator (3,4) to liquorice root powder at concentrations lower than 10 mg/m3 and for progressively increasing periods up to a total of 90 min induced a 25% immediate fall in FEV1 without significant late reaction (Fig. 1). PC20 did not change significantly in the afternoon of the challenge day to liquorice roots (PC20 at 1.3 mg/ml by comparison with a value of 2.0 mg/ml before exposure). The patient was removed from her workplace with improvement in her symptoms. Values of Fev1 as a function of time after exposure to lactose and liquorice roots. This case report shows that liquorice roots can cause OA through an apparently IgE-mediated mechanism as seen by immediate skin reactivity reaction to the diluted powder of liquorice root. Thesubject also presented symptoms of occupational rhinoconjunctivitis, which is commonly encountered in the case of high-molecular-weight agents (5). Herbalists are typically at risk of developing IgE-mediated allergic conditions (6), as they are exposed to several seeds, herbs and derivatives of vegetal products. Other vegetal roots can cause OA. Vandenplas and co-workers indeed described an interesting case of OA due to sarsaparilla root dust (7). The authors thank Lori Schubert for reviewing the manuscript.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.405
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAllergySame topicOccupational exposure and asthmaFrench-language works237,207