MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994405813 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2014.2300165

A Control Strategy and Design Method for Interleaved LLC Converters Operating at Variable Switching Frequency

2014· article· en· W1994405813 on OpenAlexaff
Zhiyuan Hu, Yajie Qiu, Yan‐Fei Liu, Paresh C. Sen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvertersInterleavingElectronic engineeringAutomatic frequency controlSwitching frequencyControl theory (sociology)EngineeringVoltageComputer scienceControl (management)Electrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LLC converters face challenges in high-current applications, where the high conduction loss limits the maximum load capacity and reduces efficiency. Interleaving technique can be used to solve this problem, but the component tolerances of the resonant tanks will cause severe load sharing problem. The SCC-LLC converter was proposed to solve the load sharing problem. However, due to its constant switching frequency operation, it has some limitations over complete line and load variation compared to conventional LLC converters. In this paper, a new control strategy is proposed for the SCC-LLC converter, which enables variable switching frequency operation; thus, it provides uncompromised performance while achieving interleaved operation. Analyses and a design method are provided, and a 600-W two-phase interleaved SCC-LLC prototype is built to verify the feasibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations174
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power ElectronicsSame topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207