MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994422390 · doi:10.1109/icinfa.2010.5512363

Modeling and parameter identification of a tractor semitrailer/driver closed-loop system using the Simulated Annealing (SA) optimization approach

2010· article· en· W1994422390 on OpenAlexaff
Jianhua Chen, Zhaoheng Liu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)TractorRobustness (evolution)Vehicle dynamicsSimulated annealingClosed loopControl systemComputer scienceSensitivity (control systems)EngineeringControl engineeringAutomotive engineeringControl (management)AlgorithmArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Identifying the dynamics and parameters for an articulated heavy vehicle/driver (tractor semitrailer/driver) system is presented in this paper. The dynamic behaviour of the vehicle system is studied by setting up a closed-loop control model of a vehicle/driver system that included a three degree of freedom (3-DOF) tractor semitrailer lateral dynamic model and a driver steering model. It is assumed that the driver steering control model responds to the vehicle state vector following a time delay. The inherent driver steering control parameters to be identified are the state vector's coefficients, here defined as an optimal control vector. The Simulated Annealing (SA) optimization method is used to search for this control vector. The results show that this method (SA) gives a good convergence rate and robustness for the closed-loop vehicle/driver system under study. Various simulations and sensitivity analysis are also performed and presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.446
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVehicle Dynamics and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207