MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994435552 · doi:10.3166/ejee.16.185-220

Modular control of fault-tolerant permanent magnet synchronous machines with tooth-coil windings

2013· article· en· W1994435552 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
François Baudart, Laetitia de Viron, Sergio Ivanov, Francis Labrique

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Electrical Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectromagnetic coilModular designMagnetFault toleranceComputer scienceElectrical engineeringEngineeringDistributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Permanent magnet synchronous machines having tooth-coil windings with an alternation of wound and non-wound teeth appear to be among the best suited can didates for building high performance and high reliability electrical drives. After a short presentation of the main features of these machines, this paper discusses a modular control architecture which allows to make their operation fault-tolerant to the loss of feeding of one phase in order to increase their reliability. The main feature of the proposed architecture consists in using, for ensuring the torque control, one Park reference frame per phase. It is shown that this control architecture allows an easy detection of the faulted phase when a fault occurs and a simple control reconfiguration in order to palliate the failure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.151
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Electrical EngineeringSame topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207