MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Complication of a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Causing Duodenal Ischemia

2006· article· en· W1994443460 on OpenAlexaff
Guillaume Martel, Rania I. Lingas, Andrea Gutauskas, Heather D. Clark

Bibliographic record

VenueSurgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFoley catheterSurgeryPercutaneous endoscopic gastrostomyGastrostomyBalloonFoleyDuodenumVomitingComplicationFeeding tubeCatheterEnteral administrationTube (container)Balloon catheterParenteral nutrition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 33-year-old woman with a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube was admitted with bilious vomiting, 1 month after her feeding tube was replaced by a temporary Foley catheter. A computed tomography scan of her abdomen revealed a 4.5 cm by 7.5 cm fluid-filled structure in the distal duodenum surrounding the Foley feeding tube. Approximately 100 mL of fluid was aspirated from the Foley's balloon port. We hypothesized that the Foley catheter was flushed inappropriately through the balloon port, causing an iatrogenic ischemic duodenal injury. Conservative management was successful in the intensive care unit. This case highlights an unusual complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes. In addition, it emphasizes the temporary nature of Foley catheters as replacement gastrostomy tubes, and the importance of training in the handling of feeding tubes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSurgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous TechniquesSame topicClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyFrench-language works237,207