The Effects of Intranasal Budesonide on Allergen-induced Production of Interleukin-5 and Eotaxin, Airways, Blood, and Bone Marrow Eosinophilia, and Eosinophil Progenitor Expansion in Sensitized Mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have previously demonstrated that allergen inhalation induces expansion of bone marrow eosinophil progenitors in sensitized mice and subjects with asthma and that the inhaled corticosteroid, budesonide, reduced baseline but not allergen-induced increase in bone marrow eosinophil/basophil progenitors (EoB-CFU) in subjects with asthma. Here, we evaluated the effects of intranasal budesonide on allergen-induced increases in interleukin (IL)-5 and eotaxin in the airway and peripheral blood, expansion of bone marrow Eo-CFU and eosinophilia in bone marrow, peripheral blood and airway, as well as airway hyperresponsiveness, in ovalbumin (OVA)-sensitized mice. Budesonide treatment attenuated allergen-induced eosinophilia in bone marrow, peripheral blood, and airways as well as allergen-induced increases in bone marrow eosinophil progenitors but not allergen-induced increases in IL-5 or eotaxin 12 h following the second of two daily exposures to allergen; at later time points treatment was associated with attenuation of IL-5, eosinophilia, Eo-CFU, and airway hyperresponsiveness. These results suggest that a component of the mechanism by which corticosteroid treatment attenuates allergen-induced airway inflammation is through suppression of bone marrow eosinophilopoiesis, and that this is likely not mediated simply through the blocking of IL-5 production at the airway.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".