Teaching the microbial growth curve concept using microalgal cultures and flow cytometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The microbial growth curve is widely studied within microbiology classes and bacteria are usually the microbial model used. Here, we describe a novel laboratory protocol involving flow cytometry to assess the growth dynamics of the unicellular microalgae Isochrysis galbana. The algal model represents an appropriate alternative to bacteria because its slower growth rate allows a better visualization of the growth phases, which makes the logistic of the laboratory sessions easier. Flow cytometry is a technique commonly used for cell enumeration in ecology, microbiology, and medical sciences because of its accuracy and speed. In this experiment, microbial growth was observed under two light conditions and cell abundance was monitored using a flow cytometer and a haemocytometer. The chlorophyll a fluorescence of each cell was also measured by the flow cytometer and was used as an index of cellular content of photosynthetic pigments. Students were asked to compare the results obtained with the two techniques and to explain the effect of light conditions on the growth curve shape and dynamics. Keywords: microbiologymicrobial growth curveflow cytometryIsochrysis galbanacell counting techniques
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".