A Population-Based Study of Tuberculosis in Children and Adolescents in Ontario
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are few population-based data on presentation and treatment of tuberculosis (TB) in children and adolescents in Ontario. METHODS: We analyzed data from 121 patients less than 17 years of age with TB disease reported to the Province of Ontario between 1999 and 2002. Physician provider data were obtained from the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. RESULTS: Of the 121 patients, 84 (69.4%) patients were foreign born. The median time of residence in Canada before diagnosis was 2.7 years (range, 7 days-16 years). Diagnosis was made by symptoms in 78 (64.5%), by contact investigation in 25 (20.7%), and by immigration screening in 5 (4.1%) patients. Pulmonary TB occurred in 94 (77.7%) patients. When cases detected by contact tracing and screening were excluded, isolated extrapulmonary TB was present in 4 (23.5%), 6 (35.0%), and 19 (37.0%) of young children (0-4 years), older children (5-12 years), and adolescents (13-17 years), respectively. Eleven patients (9.1%) had drug-resistant strains. Eighty (66.1%) patients received directly observed therapy (DOT). Prescribed treatment was completed in 105 (86.8%) patients with a trend toward higher completion rates in those receiving DOT (P = 0.07). Of 57 physician providers, 50 (87.7%) had treated less than 1 pediatric TB patient/year during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Extrapulmonary disease accounted for a high proportion of TB in older children and adolescents who presented with symptoms. One-third of patients did not receive DOT and most were cared for by physicians with limited experience in managing TB. Further studies are needed to determine whether these factors influence outcome in pediatric TB.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".