MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994511107 · doi:10.1002/zaac.200700543

Synthesis and X‐ray Structures of the Polycyclic Dimers {[PhB(μ‐N<i>t</i>Bu)<sub>2</sub>AsN(<i>t</i>Bu)H]LiI}<sub>2</sub> and [PhB(μ‐N<i>t</i>Bu)<sub>2</sub>AsN(<i>t</i>Bu)Li]<sub>2</sub>

2008· article· en· W1994511107 on OpenAlexaff
J. Konu, T. Chivers

Bibliographic record

VenueZeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine Chemie · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCoordination Chemistry and Organometallics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdductDimerDiethyl etherChemistryLithium (medication)MonomerIodideSolventNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyMedicinal chemistryEtherYield (engineering)CrystallographyStereochemistryDerivative (finance)Inorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The metathesis of [PhB( μ ‐N t Bu) 2 ]AsCl and t BuN(H)Li in 1:1 molar ratio in diethyl ether produced the amido derivative [PhB(μ‐N t Bu) 2 AsN( t Bu)H] ( 1 ) in good yield. The lithiation of 1 with one equivalent of n BuLi afforded the lithium salt [PhB(μ‐N t Bu) 2 AsN( t Bu)Li] ( 2a ). Both 1 and 2a were characterized by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy. The crystal structure of 2a is comprised of a U‐shaped, centrosymmetric dimer in which the monomeric [PhB(μ‐N t Bu) 2 AsN( t Bu)] − Li + units are linked by Li‐N interactions to give a six‐rung ladder. Oxidation of 2a with one‐half equivalent of I 2 in diethyl ether resulted in hydrogen abstraction from the solvent to give the dimeric lithium iodide adduct {[PhB(μ‐N t Bu) 2 AsN( t Bu)H]LiI} 2 ( 1 ·LiI) with a central Li 2 I 2 ring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine ChemieSame topicCoordination Chemistry and OrganometallicsFrench-language works237,207