MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994516314 · doi:10.7209/tanso.2006.281

Landmarks for graphitization

2006· article· en· W1994516314 on OpenAlexaff
A. Oberlin, Sylvie Bonnamy, Kyoichi Oshida

Bibliographic record

VenueTANSO · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nautical Research Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecipitationCarbon fibersMacromoleculeMaterials scienceHydrogenCrystal (programming language)Range (aeronautics)CrystallographyTransformation (genetics)Chemical physicsChemical engineeringChemistryComposite materialOrganic chemistryPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper is divided in two parts. The first one recalls the necessary basis of ordered and disordered materials crystal-lography applied to carbons. The second part deals with the transformation of macromolecules (natural or industrial) to carbon and the eventual graphitization of the end-products. It is shown that the final ordering is entirely under the depend-ence of the elemental composition of the precursor through liquid crystals (Local Molecular Orientations: LMO' s) demixtion. The numerical parameter used is FLMO (atomic ratio of cross-linking atoms over hydrogen at the occurrence of liquid crystals precipitation). The end-products range progressively from non-graphitizing to graphitizing carbons as FLMO decreases from 0.3-0.5 to zero.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.107

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTANSOSame topicGraphite, nuclear technology, radiation studiesFrench-language works237,207