MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994522119 · doi:10.1115/imece2006-13844

Modal Interactions in Resonant Microscanners

2006· article· en· W1994522119 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Mechanics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModalExcitationVoltageExcited stateResonance (particle physics)Modal analysisBendingNormal modeEigenvalues and eigenvectorsControl theory (sociology)WavelengthAcousticsSensitivity (control systems)PhysicsOpticsMaterials scienceComputer scienceVibrationStructural engineeringElectronic engineeringEngineeringAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fast response of micromirrors and their ability to achieve large scanning angles and low wavelength sensitivity, has made them an appealing substitute for traditional scanning and display technologies. To achieve large rotation angles, while minimizing the voltage requirements, the microscanner is excited at its resonance frequency and then used to steer a light beam along a surface. In this work, we develop a comprehensive model of a torsional microscanner. Based on the eigenvalue problem, we reduce the model to a 2-DOF lumped-mass model that captures the significant dynamics of the microscanner. We use the method of multiple scales to derive an approximate analytical solution of the microscanner response to combined DC and resonant AC voltage excitation. We examined the characteristics of the solution and found that, for a range of DC voltage, a two-to-one internal resonance occurs between the first two modes. Therefore, the energy fed to the first (torsional) mode may be channeled to the second (bending) mode causing an undesirable steady-state response. This phenomenon results in significant degradation in the microscanner performance, therefore, the designer needs to identify it, design around it, or control it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it