L’urbain : un entre-deux historiographique. Les villes italiennes à l’époque contemporaine. Parcours de lectures à travers les thèmes de l’historiographie récente
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article aborde certains nœuds du débat historiographique actuel sur les ville italiennes. Il analyse d’abord la capacité de résistance de la société rurale et la manière dont celle-ci a conditionné Vhistoriographique du rapport ville/campagne. Il explique ensuite comment le déclin du paradigme historiographique du méridiona-lisme classique et Vaffirmation du modèle de la troisième Italie ont réactivé Vintérêt pour les villes méridionales et les centres de l’Italie du Nord-Est. Puis, l’article explique comment la dialectique de l’histoire administrative entre le centre et la périphérie et celle de l’histoire politico-culturelle entre construction des identités locales et processus de nationalisation ont représenté une clé de lecture de la ville italienne contemporaine. Enfin, l’article aborde brièvement comment l’historiographie italienne a confronté le rapport entre morphologie physique, morphologie sociale et morphologie des représentations de la ville.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".