MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Reproducible metacarpal joint space width measurements using 3D analysis of images acquired with high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography

2013· article· en· W1994541913 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Engineering & Physics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantitative computed tomographyJoint (building)ReproducibilityMetacarpophalangeal jointNuclear medicineMedicineBiomedical engineeringRadiologyMathematicsBone densityAnatomyOsteoporosisPathologyThumb

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Joint space narrowing is an important feature of progressive joint damage and functional impairment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods to provide a continuous measurement of joint space width have not been adopted in research or clinical settings. High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) (Scanco Medical AG, Brüttisellen, Switzerland) accurately and reproducibly images bone microstructure at a nominal isotropic voxel dimension of 82 μm. Given the ability of HR-pQCT to detect bone margins with high precision, we developed methodology to measure a three-dimensional (3D) metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint space width and tested the reproducibility of the scan protocol with hand repositioning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive HR-pQCT scans of the 2nd and 3rd MCP joints of ten subjects with early RA (70% female, mean age 45 years), with repositioning between scans, were obtained. The periosteal edges of the metacarpal head and proximal phalanx base were detected using the μCT Evaluation Program V6.0 (Scanco Medical AG). Using the method of 'fitting maximal spheres', the joint space width and distribution of joint space thickness was estimated. RESULTS: The mean minimum joint space width of the 2nd MCP was 1.82 mm (SD 0.20) and of the 3rd MCP 1.84 mm (SD 0.23). Reproducibility with repositioning was reliable, with overlapping filtered histograms and a root square mean coefficient of variance of 4.8%. CONCLUSIONS: We provide reproducible methodology for evaluating the joint space width of the MCP joints. When combined with the assessment of erosions and periarticular bone density, HR-pQCT may be the ideal technology to assess disease activity and progression in RA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.572
Threshold uncertainty score0.705

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it