Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reviewed by: Transculturing Auto/Biography: Forms of Life Writing Marlene Kadar (bio) Rosalia Baena , ed. Transculturing Auto/Biography: Forms of Life Writing. London: Routledge/Taylor and Francis, 2007. 129 pp. ISBN 0-4154-0043-5, $150. Rosalia Baena's collection of essays on life writing draws attention to the crucial significance of form in life writing, and in particular, the engagement with and revision of generic traditions and paradigms that come with their own literary and ideological expectations. These expectations are considered [End Page 282] most vital when evaluating and interpreting transcultural identities, so many of the essays focus on multicultural texts and ethnic and immigrant self-representations that aim to demonstrate the various strengths of a diversity of life writing forms. Following on Janice Kulyk Keefer's 1993 definition, Baena explains that this key term, "transcultural," is preferable to the term "multicultural" because it allows for a more dynamic engagement of ethnicity and social formation that stimulates narratives that can exist in cultural and linguistic contact zones, or "in between" them. As a starting point, this is a very good one. Baena's short introductory essay takes the same title as the book: "Transculturing Auto/biography: Forms of Life Writing." In it, Baena claims that her collection is a response to Susanna Egan's provocative 1999 "critical challenge"; namely, "How do autobiographers co-opt and adapt the genres that express this fraught moment of in-between?" For Baena and her authors, the "in-between" is various and unfixed. It reaches from life writing forms in film (Dorothea Fischer-Hornung's essay on Maya Deren's early films) to "paradigms of Canadian literary biography" (Ana Beatriz Delgado's essay applies Northrop Frye's idea of myth to Charlotte Gray's Sisters in the Wilderness) and travel writing; and from the politics of food in Italian American women's life writing (Alison D. Goeller's essay links reproduction, narration, and recipe in a series of texts) to representations of the autobiographical in Marjane Satrapi's popular graphic text, Persepolis—an essay by Rocio G. Davis. Eight essays in all traverse a variety of life writing genres and a host of separate and/ or intersecting communities and cultures, opening up a fruitful transcultural zone in various forms of modern life writing. Although some of the essays focus on one author, artist, or autobiographer, the strongest essays propose theories and methods that help us read life writing forms broadly, and are comparative or interdisciplinary in methodology. William Boelhower's essay, for example, generalizes meaning about a particular life writing form—immigrant autobiography. It theorizes different immigrants and ethnic stances across the backdrop of the "immigrant autobiographical wager" as the starting point for ethnic semiosis, and, in its way, provides a lens for critique in this field, a field in which literary heroes participate in what Boelhower calls "the gift economy." Gita Rajan's essay is comparative and interdisciplinary as it studies the self-portraiture of three South Asian artists—Siona Benjamin, Annu Palakunnathu Matthew, and Ambreen Butt—within Jeanne Perreault's 1995 feminist framework of autography. To Perreault, Rajan adds Kristeva and others, focusing on race politics and civil liberties within an Asian American tradition, but here the canvas is seen as a metaphor for forms of life writing. [End Page 283] Not all of the contributions are this provocative, but all do illuminate one aspect of the burden or the joy of a transcultural identity inscribed in a life writing text—a "real" one or a metaphoric one. Accomplished Canadianist Danielle Schaub, for example, takes Fredelle Bruser Maynard's work to a another autobiographical level by reading Maynard's two short story cycles in dynamic unison, quoting generously from Helen Buss's pioneering feminist study, Mapping Our Selves (1993). What becomes abundantly clear is the remarkable contribution feminist theorists have made to the field of transcultural and multicultural (Baena's less favored word) life writing studies, and the huge range of topics and genres that can be invoked under the single cover of life writing studies. No longer in its formative years, Life Writing studies, it seems, is in its adolescence and is soon to break out into its adulthood. Originally a...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".