Root storage proteins, with particular reference to taproots
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The presence of storage proteins has been reported in roots of several perennial and biennial weed and crop species, and particularly in members of the Compositae, Euphorbiaceae, and Leguminosae. In some species the amount of these root proteins fluctuates seasonally, increasing in the fall and winter months and declining in the spring and early summer. Also, the root proteins may decline during regrowth of decapitated plants. The evidence that these proteins play a role as storage proteins is frequently only circumstantial; moreover, they are usually only a relatively minor component of the total nitrogen pool within the root. Only one root protein, that from the dandelion taproot, has been extensively characterized, and it has no properties in common with known vegetative storage proteins. The literature on root proteins is reviewed, with particular emphasis on those present in taproots. The paucity of definitive data allows few conclusions to be reached, and more research is required to establish the role, nature, and importance of root proteins.Key words: taproots, perennial weeds, root proteins, nitrogen pools, storage proteins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it