MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994620426 · doi:10.1016/s1044-0305(02)00379-3

Chemically-assigned classification of aerosol mass spectra

2002· article· en· W1994620426 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Phillip V. Tan, Oscar Malpica, Greg J. Evans, Sandy Owega, Michael S. Fila

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersHealth Canada
KeywordsChemistryMass spectrumAerosolSpectral lineAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Linear discriminant analysisMass spectrometryParticulatesOutlierChromatographyStatisticsMathematicsOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An Algorithm for Discriminant Analysis of Mass Spectra--ADAMS--was created that classified aerosol mass spectra into dominant chemically-assigned classes, and grouped rare cases in an outlier class. ADAMS was trained with ambient particulate matter (PM) mass spectra, and then validated through classification tests on known spectra with random noise added, various standard chemicals, and salt-spiked polystyrene latex microspheres. The classification results showed that ADAMS gave a reasonable chemical description of the particle populations. In contrast to adaptive resonance theory (ART-2a) classification, ADAMS could be trained to be advantageously sensitive or insensitive to selected chemical markers. Application of ADAMS to Toronto ambient PM and diesel PM (NIST 2975) demonstrated that these samples could be well described, with a low proportion of the cases falling into the outlier class. Such an algorithm may find application for source-receptor modeling of aerosol mass spectra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2002
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society for Mass SpectrometrySame topicAir Quality Monitoring and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207