MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994642877 · doi:10.1353/abr.2008.0111

Myths of the Skin Trade

2008· article· en· W1994642877 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carol Quinn

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican book review/˜The œAmerican book review · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSex work and related issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMythologyPoetryFableFolkloreHistoryNarrativeLiteratureIrishSeal (emblem)Art historyArtPhilosophyAncient history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Page 29 July–August 2008 Myths of the Skin Trade Carol Quinn Silkie Anne-Marie Cusac Many Mountains Moving Press http://www.mmminc.org 84 pages; paper, $14.95 In the author’s preface to this collection of poems , Anne-Marie Cusac explains that, according to Irish and Scottish folklore (distantly remembered in Nova Scotia, where these poems are set), “A Silkie is a mythical creature, a seal that leaves the ocean and takes human shape.” Silkies are exceptionally beautiful and watch the shoreline for potential human mates who may have strayed from society or become discontented with their home lives. In her afterword, Cusac writes that, throughout the Canadian Maritime provinces, “seals have plunged in status from a source of food and clothing…to an animal akin to a rodent, crowding and polluting beaches, and eating too much.” Since the 1970s, strict regulation of seal hunting has all but ended the fur trade, and is believed by many Maritimers to have devastated the fishing industry. The collection of poems that results from the conflation of these narratives, however, is less an environmental fable than it is a book-length, mythologized account of impossible love. In a place where survival is difficult, an immortal Silkie and a human woman are fated by their very natures to be incompatible. They have different conceptions of time and conflicting expectations in love. Even the alleged ravenousness of the seal has been incorporated into Cusac’s myth, as the Silkie sometimes speaks of his desire for women in terms of his gluttony. The phenomenological boundary of the sea and the lovers’ different outlooks on time, mortality, and desire give this story of doomed love a mythic resonance. Silkie is less an environmental fable than it is a book-length, mythologized account of impossible love. But how successful is Cusac in creating a cycle of poems that could constitute a contemporary myth? In its treatment of loss, Cusac’s book may recall RobertAlter’s idea that “Myth…enables [humans] to experience imaginatively what logic might deny….” These poems are replete with challenges to the central character’s sense of reality. After the Silkie seduces Dulsie (Cusac’s protagonist), Dulsie’s father warns her, “The legal code doesn’t apply / to impossibilities .” Such a statement reminds Dulsie that she has left the protection of her society, and challenges the validity of her perceptions. Dulsie’s urges and instincts are similarly questioned: “the need creeping along her lips / is not anything / anyone calls ‘real.’” She will respond to her own pregnancy and eventual abandonment with both disbelief and the meager faith of perpetual desire, as cognitive dissonance is the hallmark of this relationship. Dulsie is not the only character to experience doubt and faith simultaneously—and this contradiction may give Cusac’s mythic narrative a particularly contemporary feel. If myths were once unquestioningly believed, a modern audience may sometimes hope that myths contain a sort of truth—the record of an event in the distant past, for example—but also approach myths with skepticism. Dulsie exists at this crux of belief and disbelief, as does the narrator of “metamorphosis 1,” who describes the Silkie’s transformation (apparently while the speaker is skinning a seal): Don’t imagine the change in skin slit snip scissor from wet, thick, fatted whittle hack to papery and thin doesn’t cause pain. Sealskins are central to both Cusac’s myth and the ecological controversy surrounding the seal hunt. The Silkie’s sealskin is his means of escape from Dulsie: a caul of mutability into which he is reborn as a being who scarcely remembers his human lover. Dulsie will steal the Silkie’s fur in an attempt to “make him human,” “change his nature and his smell,” and make it so “he cannot leave her, and she’s won.” In the process, she will unknowingly cause so much pain that he can no longer stay with her. The seal-skinner also seems to be unaware of the pain that he or she is causing. Unlike Dulsie, however, this speaker has good reason to doubt the myth, but keeps telling the old story: Don’t imagine it doesn’t excite him. nip...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.148
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.009
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican book review/˜The œAmerican book reviewSame topicSex work and related issuesFrench-language works237,207