MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994652380 · doi:10.1080/00207540412331327754

A robust cell formation approach for varying product demands

2005· article· en· W1994652380 on OpenAlexafffund
Dongxing Cao, Mingyuan Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Production Research · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTabu searchCellular manufacturingMathematical optimizationProduct (mathematics)Probabilistic logicHeuristicCell formationComputer scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In cellular manufacturing environments, manufacturing cells are generally formed based on deterministic product demands. In this paper, we consider a system configuration problem with product demands expressed in a number of probabilistic scenarios. An optimization model integrating cell formation and part allocation is developed to generate a robust system configuration to minimize machine cost and expected inter-cell material handling cost. A two-stage Tabu search based heuristic algorithm is developed to find the optimal or near optimal solutions to the NP-hard problem. Numerical examples show that this model leads to an appropriate compromise between system configuration costs and expected material handling costs to meet the varying product demands. These example problems also show that the proposed algorithm is effective and computationally efficient for small or medium size problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Production ResearchSame topicAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics OptimizationFrench-language works237,207