Fluorescence depolarization in poly[2-methoxy-5-((2-ethylhexyl)oxy)-1,4-phenylenevinylene]: Sites versus eigenstates hopping
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report upon a theoretical study of singlet exciton migration and relaxation within a model conjugated polymer chain. Starting from poly[2-methoxy-5-((2-ethylhexyl)oxy)-1,4-phenylenevinylene] polymer chains, we assume that the pi-conjugation is disrupted by conformational disorder of the chain itself, giving rise to a localized Frenkel exciton basis. Electronic coupling between segments as determined by the coupling between the transition densities of the localized excitons gives rise to delocalized exciton states. Using a kinetic Monte Carlo approach to compute the exciton transfer kinetics within the manifold of either the dressed chromophore site basis or dressed eigenstate basis, we find that the decay of the polarization anisotropy of the exciton is profoundly affected by the delocalization of the exciton over multiple basis segments. Two time scales emerge from the exciton migration simulations: a short, roughly 10 ps, time scale corresponding to rapid hopping about the initial excitation site followed by a slower, 180 ps, component corresponding to long range hopping. We also find that excitations can become trapped at long times when the hopping rate to lower-energy states is longer than the radiative lifetime of the exciton.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".