Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although the number of cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) has passed the 8000 mark worldwide, the indications are that the outbreak is otherwise being contained, despite the latest outbreak in Toronto. At 26 May there had been 8202 probable cases of SARS and 725 deaths in 29 countries. A total of 4662 people have recovered. On 23 May the World Health Organization lifted its travel warning on Hong Kong and Guangdong province because there have been significant improvements in containing the outbreak there. “Guangdong was the first place to have cases of SARS, but I am pleased to note that due to the efforts of the local and national health authorities, with support from WHO and partners, the outbreaks in Guangdong and Hong Kong are being contained,” said Gro Harlem Brundtland, director general of WHO. WHO's advisory for other parts of China, including Beijing, is still in place and has been extended to cover the whole of Taiwan, as SARS has spread from Taipei to other cities. Two new clusters of cases have also been reported in Toronto (31 March, p 1162). Infections across China have slowed dramatically, and on 26 May …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".