MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994690217 · doi:10.1109/ims3tw.2011.25

An Improved Light Source Using Filtered Tungsten Lamps as an Affordable Solar Simulator for Testing of Photovoltaic Cells

2011· article· en· W1994690217 on OpenAlexaff
Clint Landrock, Badr Omrane, Jeydmer Aristizabal, Bożena Kamińska, Carlo Menon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Electronics and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolar simulatorPhotovoltaic systemLight sourceMaterials scienceOptical filterOptoelectronicsComputer scienceTungstenNear-infrared spectroscopySolar cellEnvironmental scienceOpticsElectrical engineeringEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An improved Tungsten light source system for photo voltaic cell testing constructed from low-cost, commercially available materials is presented as an alternative to current high-cost solar simulators. In this work, spectral correction of the Tungsten light source is achieved by increasing the colour temperature to ~5200 K using inexpensive commercially available filters. Spectral measurements of the corrected light source reveal that a better spectrum match towards the solar spectrum is achieved than what has been previously demonstrated by our team. Specifically, the improved solar spectrum match is achieved by substantial filtering of the infrared range. The proposed setup is used to evaluate the performance of both silicon and organic based solar cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOrganic Electronics and PhotovoltaicsFrench-language works237,207