MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994694961 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.81.235211

Compositional dependence of the exciton reduced mass in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>GaAs</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Bi</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn><mml:mo>–</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2010· article· lv· W1994694961 on OpenAlexaff
Giorgio Pettinari, A. Polimeni, J. H. Blokland, Rinaldo Trotta, Peter C. M. Christianen, M. Capizzi, J.C. Maan, X. Lu, Erin C. Young, T. Tiedje

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2010
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsExcitonValence (chemistry)Conduction bandCrystallographyCondensed matter physicsAtomic physicsElectronQuantum mechanicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the compositional dependence of the exciton reduced mass, ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\text{exc}}$, of ${\text{GaAs}}_{1\ensuremath{-}x}{\text{Bi}}_{x}$ in a very large Bi concentration range $(x=0\text{--}10.6\mathrm{%})$. Photoluminescence under high magnetic fields ($B$ up to 30 T) shows that ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\text{exc}}$ increases rapidly until $x\ensuremath{\sim}1.5\mathrm{%}$ and then oscillates around $\ensuremath{\sim}0.08\text{ }{m}_{0}$, ${m}_{0}$ being the electron mass in vacuum, up to about $x=6\mathrm{%}$. Surprisingly, for $x&gt;8\mathrm{%}$ the exciton reduced mass decreases below the GaAs value, in agreement with the expectations of a $k\ensuremath{\cdot}p$ model. Such a behavior reveals the existence of different concentration intervals, where continuum states of the valence and conduction band hybridize with Bi-related levels at different extents, thus conferring to the band edges a localized or bandlike character for $x&lt;6\mathrm{%}$ and $x&gt;8\mathrm{%}$, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.119

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesFrench-language works237,207