MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Systemic capillary leak syndrome presenting as recurrent shock

2006· article· en· W1994709670 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Critical Care Medicine · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMuscle and Compartmental Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMcGill UniversityCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineShock (circulatory)Capillary refillTerlipressinSeptic shockVomitingAnesthesiaEdemaSepsisSurgeryHepatorenal syndromeInternal medicineBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of systemic capillary leak syndrome (SCLS) in a child. DESIGN: Case report. SETTING: Pediatric intensive care unit. PATIENT: A 6-yr-old girl was admitted twice to the pediatric intensive care unit, at a 10-month interval, in severe shock with important edema. RESULTS: The patient presented with acute symptoms of abdominal pain, vomiting, and syncope in the hour preceding the shock. During both episodes necessary management included aggressive intravenous fluid rehydration, mechanical ventilation, and use of inotropes/vasopressors. Suspicion of a lower limb fasciitis necessitated surgical exploration, but pathology reports were negative on both occasions revealing only subcutaneous tissue edema. The patient recovered within 24 hrs on both episodes. Investigation ruled out cardiogenic shock and septic shock due to bacterial etiology. On the first episode, a nasopharyngeal aspirate was positive for influenza A (H3N2) by both viral immunofluorescence and culture. The presumed diagnosis was toxic shock syndrome associated with influenza virus. On the second episode, all bacterial and virology cultures remained negative. Hypovolemic shock was suspected, but there was no history of dehydration, bleeding, or gastrointestinal losses (persistent vomiting or diarrhea). Noninfectious causes of hypovolemic shock with edema were ruled out, leading us to believe that she suffered from SCLS. CONCLUSIONS: Although well described in the adult literature, there have been few reports of SCLS in pediatric patients. SCLS should be considered in the differential diagnosis of recurrent hypovolemic shock without identifiable cause. The only therapeutic intervention is to obtain vascular access when initial manifestations occur and give aggressive fluid reanimation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it