MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994729933 · doi:10.1002/ddr.20220

Effect of a novel partial adenosine A<sub>1</sub> receptor agonist VCP102 in reducing ischemic damage in the mouse heart

2007· article· en· W1994729933 on OpenAlexaff
Anna Butcher, Alison Gregg, Peter J. Scammells, Roselyn B. Rose’Meyer

Bibliographic record

VenueDrug Development Research · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdenosine and Purinergic Signaling
Canadian institutionsCentre for Drug Research and Development
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgonistContractilityAdenosineAntagonistAdenosine receptorInternal medicineChemistryEndocrinologyPartial agonistAdenosine A1 receptorIschemiaCardioprotectionReceptorMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Investigations into the use of A1 adenosine receptor (A1AR) agonists in reducing post‐ischemic damage to the heart have been of significant interest to cardiovascular research. The present study examined the cardioprotective effects of the partial A1AR agonist, N6‐[4‐[1,1,3,3‐tetramethylisoindolin‐2‐yloxyl‐5amido]ethyl]phenyl]adenosine (VCP102) and the full A1AR agonist, N6‐cyclopentyl adenosine (CPA), in murine isolated hearts perfused in Langendorff mode. Following 30‐min ischemia, hearts were treated with the A1AR agonists during early reperfusion for 15 min (IR protocol). Significant increases in left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) and contractility (dP/dtmax) were observed at the final reperfusion values for VCP102 (100 nM)‐treated hearts, as compared with the control tissues (P<0.05). EDP values in VCP102‐treated hearts were also lower than control tissues (P<0.05). The A1AR antagonist, 8‐cyclopentyl‐1,3‐dipropylxanthine (DPCPX, 10 nM) and the A3AR antagonist 3‐ethyl‐5‐benzyl‐2‐methyl‐4‐pheylethynyl‐6‐phenyl‐1,4‐(±)‐diphydropyridine‐3,5‐dicarboxylate (MRS1191, 200 nM) attenuated the protective actions of 15 min VCP102 during IR (P<0.05). An improvement in functional recovery was not observed with CPA (100 nM, P>0.05). Infarct size was also significantly reduced in VCP102‐ or CPA‐treated hearts as compared with control tissues (P<0.05). DPCPX and MRS1191 attenuated VCP102‐induced decreases in infarct size (P<0.05), but did not alter the responses to CPA (P>0.05). Significant reductions in cardiac troponin I release and expression of the pro‐apoptotic zymogen caspase‐3 were observed in both treatment groups (P<0.05). In summary, both A1ARs and A3ARs may play a role in mediating cardioprotection and improving functional recovery in the IR heart with VCP102. Furthermore, treatment with the partial agonist appeared to confer improved functional cardiac protection when compared with CPA. Drug Dev Res 68:529–537, 2007. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDrug Development ResearchSame topicAdenosine and Purinergic SignalingFrench-language works237,207