« Tous les livres du monde, excepté un » : L’influence d’un livre (1837), roman de la lecture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose de relire L’influence d’un livre (1837) de Philippe Aubert de Gaspé fils en tant que roman de la lecture qui problématise le rapport à l’écrit de la culture québécoise naissante. Tout le roman est en effet sous-tendu par deux pratiques de lecture concurrentes : la lecture intensive et la lecture extensive. Le protagoniste Charles Amand est le représentant par excellence de la lecture intensive, dévoyée, puisqu’il lit sans cesse Le Petit Albert. M. B***, prototype de l’homme des Lumières, est, quant à lui, l’incarnation de la lecture extensive, puisqu’il possède « tous les livres du monde, excepté un », allusion transparente à son adhésion à la libre-pensée qui n’a que faire de la Bible. Le futur gendre du protagoniste, Saint-Céran, est, lui, un lecteur mixte qui permettra à l’alchimiste raté de s’émanciper de la lecture servile et littérale de son grimoire grâce aux cadeaux qu’il lui offre à l’occasion de son mariage avec sa fille : le Dictionnaire des merveilles de la nature et une vingtaine de manuels des différents arts et métiers. Or, c’est dans ce don que réside l’explication de la conversion de Charles Amand à la lecture critique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".